Talk:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

for use of this work as a source in Wikipedia articles.

Year?

The article says it was published in 1849, our template says 1867, and the ancientlibrary.com copy we refer to says 1870. --Delirium 01:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OCR'ed versions

ancientlibrary.com has been down for a few weeks at it appears that the university of michigan text is incomplete, only containing the first ~1000 pages. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.211.76.233 (talk) 23:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Reputation

Is there any documentation for "high reputation"? DGG (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I can't say I've seen this work cited very much outside the Internet. I also think the reference to "the relatively slow rate of change of classical scholarship" is potentially misleading; classics may move more slowly than physics or medicine, but scholarship published 164 years ago is old by any standard. I've removed both statements, but by all means restore them if a published source can be found. EALacey (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Offline

The online version has been down for weeks. Does anybody know a reason? If the situation remains it would be quite a disaster because Wikipedia has thousands of links to the book.--Hyphantes (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hyphantes: I don't know, but in Perseus version I haven't noticed any problem. --Epìdosis 19:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]